Scholarships???
#1
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:47 AM
Misti said the other night in the Golden Eagle Club dinner that we only attempted to sign one player this year in recruiting is that because we only had one scholarship to offer! How is this possible if we are losing 3 seniors who are all on scholarship? So it sounds to me that our womens team has been competing in a league (The Summit) going up against teams that have full resources while we are limited. It also seems that we will be heading to the Southland Conference handicap and with fewer scholarships to offer than our opponents will have.
Is there Gender Equality? I ask for some answers if anyone has them?
#2
Posted 15 February 2012 - 09:34 AM
Surely you aren't just now noticing the vast difference in how the men's basketball team is marketed vs. the women's basketball team. Many people have wondered the very same thing....couldn't the marketing of the women's basketball program be stepped up? I'm guessing it comes down to funds. The men's program generates more revenue due to ticket sales. The women's program has increased the ticket prices; however, they aren't selling a ton of tickets.
Regarding your other questions/statements - have you never heard of Title IX? I think that might have some answers to your questions regarding what is considered "equity". I found a quick fact sheet (nevermind on the MU website) but might give you some insight. http://equity.missou...y/athletics.php
Finally, don't assume that ORU has been or will be heading to Southland Conference handicapped. You would have to compare scholarships with the other teams in both conferences, as they may experience the same at their schools before coming to that conclusion. Regarding losing 3 scholarships and replacing only with one, not sure what that is due to. Are there some currently on the team that are not on scholarship that will be added? Or is ORU having to give up some scholarships due to the conference move?
#3
Posted 15 February 2012 - 09:50 AM
#4
Posted 15 February 2012 - 01:11 PM
If you can find a sponsor that is willing to shell out $15,000 for the bobbleheads and another $15,000 for the t-shirts, you could have a promotion like that for a women's game.
Same/similar answer goes toward the other questions in this thread. Simple economics. I'm sorry that is the answer and I truly wish it were different, but it's not. There is simply not a market for TV, advertising, tickets, etc, for women's athletics.
Hopefully it will change in the future. I would LOVE to see 10,000 in the seats, televised games, and big sponsor dollars flow into ORU women's basketball!
#5
Posted 15 February 2012 - 01:33 PM
NCAA considers cutting football and women's basketball scholarships
Coaches leery of proposed scholarship cuts
Coaches weigh in on scholarships
#6
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:00 PM
#7
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:20 PM
ORU has four tier-one sports: men's basketball, women's basketball, baseball and volleyball. The athletic department focuses most of its attention on these four sports. All of the sports have equal opportunity to raise funds for projects. It is just easier for the men's sports to do so. Men's basketball raises money through donations, guarantee games, etc. Those opportunities are just not available to the women for the most part. The athletic department/university provides scholarships (tuition, housing, etc) as well as practice facilities, coaches, trainers, etc. As far as promotion is concerned, the athletic department works as hard as it can to promote both men's and women's sports. The truth is that the market for women's athletics is much smaller than for men's.
-- Winston Churchill
#8
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:50 PM
#9
Posted 15 February 2012 - 06:56 PM
dsummitfan, on 15 February 2012 - 05:50 PM, said:
You have to be kidding me. If you're going to be this bold... please know what you're talking about.
Q. Does Title IX require that equal dollars be spent on men and women's sports?[indent]
No. The only provision that requires that the same dollars be spent proportional to participation is scholarships. Otherwise, male and female student-athletes must receive equitable "treatment" and "benefits."[/indent]
http://www.ncaa.org/...aq.html#dollars
#10
Posted 15 February 2012 - 06:58 PM
dsummitfan, on 15 February 2012 - 05:50 PM, said:
http://www.ncaa.org/...ix/faq.html#how
Please check your facts before posting.
#11
Posted 15 February 2012 - 07:17 PM
dsummitfan, on 15 February 2012 - 05:50 PM, said:
My daughter plays for ORU. I'm happy to stand up to the ORU athletic department and say Thank You. My daughter's tuition, room and board is paid. She has access to excellent medical care. The training facilities are nice and easily availalbe. The coaching staff is truly concerned about my daughter both on and off the court.
With the possible exception of beach volleyball, women's sports have always been less attended than men's. And because ORU does not have a money-making football venture, there may be less funds available to support other sports. But I can assure you it's the same everywhere.
I don't always agree with the coaching staff, I'm not always pleased with the team's performance.. but I am always appreciative of ORU's generosity.
#12
Posted 15 February 2012 - 07:23 PM
Q. How is Title IX applied to athletics? [indent]
Athletics programs are considered educational programs and activities. There are three basic parts of Title IX as it applies to athletics:
- Participation: Title IX requires that women and men be provided equitable opportunities to participate in sports. Title IX does not require institutions to offer identical sports but an equal opportunity to play;
- Scholarships: Title IX requires that female and male student-athletes receive athletics scholarship dollars proportional to their participation; and
- Other benefits: Title IX requires the equal treatment of female and male student-athletes in the provisions of: (a) equipment and supplies; (
scheduling of games and practice times; © travel and daily allowance/per diem; (d) access to tutoring; (e) coaching, (f) locker rooms, practice and competitive facilities; (g) medical and training facilities and services; (h) housing and dining facilities and services; (i) publicity and promotions; (j) support services and (k) recruitment of student-athlete
Number 3 states exactly what I am talking about... Equal treatment in publicity and promotions and recruitment!!!!! Just like I said
#13
Posted 15 February 2012 - 07:26 PM
#14
Posted 15 February 2012 - 07:34 PM
dsummitfan, on 15 February 2012 - 07:29 PM, said:
You're unbelievable. Read this:
Q. Does Title IX require that equal dollars be spent on men and women's sports?[indent]
No. The only provision that requires that the same dollars be spent proportional to participation is scholarships. Otherwise, male and female student-athletes must receive equitable "treatment" and "benefits."[/indent]
http://www.ncaa.org/...aq.html#dollars
#15
Posted 15 February 2012 - 07:37 PM
#16
Posted 15 February 2012 - 07:39 PM
- Other benefits: Title IX requires the equal treatment of female and male student-athletes in the provisions of: (a) equipment and supplies; (../../../public/style_emoticons/default/cool.png scheduling of games and practice times; © travel and daily allowance/per diem; (d) access to tutoring; (e) coaching, (f) locker rooms, practice and competitive facilities; (g) medical and training facilities and services; (h) housing and dining facilities and services; (i) publicity and promotions; (j) support services and (k) recruitment of student-athlete
#17
Posted 15 February 2012 - 07:47 PM
Give it a rest here.
#18
Posted 15 February 2012 - 08:01 PM
#19
Posted 15 February 2012 - 08:05 PM
TMH is probably right, let it go unless you want a storm of kool-aid drinkers on ya!
#20
Posted 15 February 2012 - 09:18 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users










